The best handheld vacuums selected for suction power, tank capacity, autonomy, wet&dry function and price to quality ratio.
Produced by the Chinese company Xiaomi, the Mi Robot is a robotic vacuum with excellent performance. For a low cost, it ensures a level of performance normally present only in high-end products.
The iRobot Roomba 671 is considered a quality robotic vacuum and has a good value for money. Given its features, this is an excellent product.
It’s expensive, but the iRobot Roomba 980 is a fantastic robotic vacuum that offers extraordinary smart and hi-tech features.
The iRobot Roomba 960 is not cheap, but if we compare it with some of its main rivals it’s not that expensive either.
Dyson has created a product with excellent characteristics, and a more than honest price tag. Considering its features, the V7 is a bargain.
The Swiss army knife was designed at the end of the nineteenth century by Karl Elsener for the Swiss army, and it still widely used.
How many times have you wondered which is the best vacuum cleaner for your home? In this article we have collected for you the best vacuum cleaners divided by type so that you can easily find the one that best suits your needs.
In this guide, we will find out how to choose the best air purifier for your needs. These products are increasingly popular, thanks to the health benefits they bring. Often, in fact, the air in our house is even more polluted than the outside and requires special attention, especially if one suffers from allergies or asthma. A necessary purchase for many, especially with the arrival of spring and the much-feared pollen.
Lately, this technologically advanced product is spreading more and more for really valid reasons. The reference is to robotic vacuums, which, as the name implies, are automated vacuum cleaners that do virtually all the work on their own. There are many types of robotic vacuum cleaners; some are programmable, others have a remote control, some can even do stairs, but all have the common task of cleaning the house instead of us.